A Texas woman is suing investigators who used dogs to pick her out of a “scent lineup” – a widely questioned investigative technique that put her in prison for six years before she was acquitted.

Megan Winfrey, 25, was freed in April of 2013 after the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals upheld its own ruling acquitting her in the 2004 murder of a high school custodian, Murray Burr.  Her father, Richard Winfrey Sr. and her brother, Richard Winfrey, Jr., have also been cleared after trials that all used the same evidence.  In a lawsuit filed recently, Winfrey accused San Jacinto County, current and former sheriffs and deputies and the dog trainer of malicious prosecution and civil rights violations.

Richard Winfrey Sr., Richard Winfrey Jr., then 19, and Megan, then 18, were charged in 2007 with killing school janitor Murray Burr two years earlier.  Winfrey Sr. was convicted in 2007 and Megan Winfrey was convicted in 2008.  Richard Winfrey Jr., was acquitted after 13 minutes of deliberations in 2009.  Richard Sr.’s conviction was overturned in 2010.  Megan Winfrey had been sentenced to life in prison with the possibility of parole.

All three cases used the same evidence:  Quincy, James, Bond, and Clue, dogs who smelled Burr’s clothing then smelled samples of suspect’s clothing.  They “alerted” on the Winfrey’s clothing, according to Deputy Keith Pikett, their trainer and handler.

The lawsuit called the dog scent lineups “the worst of junk science.”

In 2004, the FBI admitted that “human scent is easily transferred from one person or object to another…identifying someone’s scent at a crime scene is not an indication of complicity.”  In 2005, the FBI found that there is “limited scientific data” to back up the use of dogs for human scents.  In 2011, the National Institute of Health found an “overwhelming number of incorrect alerts” in its research.

Winfrey is ineligible for wrongful conviction compensation under Texas law because she was acquitted and not specifically declared “actually innocent” or pardoned.

FURTHER READING:  Texas Tribune’s Out of Prison, Winfrey Struggles Despite Acquittal

Read about three other men who were wrongfully convicted based in part on dog scent evidence:

  1. freethewronged says:

    And remember Gary Bennett who has been in prison 25 years due to John Preston and his dog scent dogs?


  2. Reblogged this on Wobbly Warrior's Blog and commented:
    Thousands were convicted using dog handlers that have been DNA-discredited; some of the convicted have been executed.


Join the Discussion

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s